Stages of Neopagan reactions to Christians
Thu Mar 09, 2006 at 11:41:05 AM PDT
That's a klunky title, but I hoped to get the attention of more than just the pagans :-).
A while back, someone wrote in a comment that:
...up till now most of my face to face interactions with Wiccans has always involved people with an enormous chip on their shoulder about the "Burning Times", those stupid Satanists giving them a bad name, and complaining about oppression because mummy took their dagger off them...
I set it aside to respond to in more detail than as a comment, then forgot about it for a while.
So, here's some of my observations on Pagans and Christians.
First, I feel I should point out that I'm using the term Pagans broadly, to include wiccans, Wiccans, Druids, Asatru, and anyone else following a not dissimilar non-Abrahamic path. Also, we are as diverse as any other group, maybe more so. The feelings of someone who finds a pagan path later in life are going to be different from those of the teen who started on the path mainly to freak out the 'rents.
That said, I've seen a fairly common pattern of what I call "Christian Backlash." A new pagan will start learning more about the past actions of various Christian groups against those perceived as "evil" (the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, etc.) and develop an attitude towards modern Christians. This can be an even stronger swing in a person who was previously very Christian, either by choice or from being raised one. Especially in the case of those doing the rebellious thing, this attitude will often manifest as the above-mentioned "chip." IMO, this is the equivalent of the newly "saved" Christian who feels a burning need to try to save everyone they know, who takes to wearing a prominent cross, posting Bible verses, etc. etc. In both cases, the person can get very defensive of their "rights" if challenged, whether by having ritual tools taken away, asked not to proselytize in the office, questioned on the numbers killed in the Burning Times, questioned on the truth of Scripture, etc.
Over time, people mellow and mature, and the pendulum swings back to the center. From a Pagan PoV, we realize that today's Christians are not responsible for the excesses of their forbearers, any more than a modern devotee of the Greco-Roman gods is responsible for Christians having been thrown to the lions. People begin to recognize that no "church" is monolithic (though some groups try hard to be ^_^), that not all Christians believe in not suffering a witch to live, that not all witches are anti-Christian...basically, that there are plenty of good and decent people on all sides of the religious divides. Finding communities like Street Prophets reinforces this :-).
The thing is, folk at this stage don't call as much attention to themselves :-). Just as most Christians wouldn't want to be judged based on Pat Robertson and his hate-mongering ilk, or on a smaller scale by the young person with the big cross who goes to the mall to try to convert everyone they can get their hands on, neither should all Neopagans be judged by the teen with the big pentagram who rails against the evils perpetrated by the Christian church.
BTW and IMO, it's not so much that the Satanists have given us a bad name, since a) we don't worship either side of the Biblical duality, and b) Satanists don't equate themselves with neopagans, being more of a philosophy than a religion in many cases. Our main problem is with outsiders (usually Christians) assuming that everyone who's Not Them is evil and worships the devil, so therefore witch = satanist.
Foo, I got distracted and lost my train of thought, but I think I covered everything I wanted to. I can always edit later if an important point comes up in the comments :-).
Permalink | 45 comments