When Catholic Hospitals Don't Act "Catholic"
Wed Feb 14, 2007 at 03:39:13 PM PDT
When I agreed "yes"
last week to going out to Chicago with the AFL-CIO to witness a union
drive first-hand, I didn't really anticipate spending so much of my
time digging into where the Catholic Church is on health care and labor
organizing. Let me start with the basics. Resurrection
Health Care (RHC) is a hospital and medical facility chain in the
Chicago area. It's organized as a not-for-profit under the sponsorship
of two orders of nuns -- the Sisters of the Holy Family of Nazareth and
the Sisters of the Resurrection, both founded in Rome in the late 1800s.
The local AFSCME Council 31 has been trying
to organize RHC workers into a union for a couple of years now.
The last basic chunk of information is that Resurrection Health Care
is -- in the way it views itself and in the way it is seen by the community
and the law -- a "Catholic" health care provider. I admit, I
had little idea what baggage that carried about week ago. But from a little
digging, it seems like caring for sick bodies as an extension of religious
ministry is part of the fiber of the American Catholic Church. Witness,
for example, how Resurrection
HC describes its mission:
Resurrection Health Care exists to witness God's sustaining love through
compassionate, family-centered care. Motivated by a reverence for life
and respect for those we serve, we are committed to improving the health
and well-being of our community. We promote a climate that empowers
all of us to effectively steward our human and financial resources.
And that same idea is everywhere you look as you jump into this nexus between
Catholicism and health care. Case in point, see how the Catholic Health
Association details what they call their "commitments",
including their "moral obligation to provide quality health care in
respect for the human dignity of each person we serve. The takeaway? That
caring for the sick is engrained in America's Catholic institutional web
made up of the archdioceses, parishes, schools, not-for-profits like RHC,
and so on. And that approach has earned them plenty of good vibes. Catholic
hospitals provide good care for all and especially the poor, the thinking
has long gone.
How this story has played out in Chicago brings us back to Resurrection.
About ten years ago, Cardinal Bernadin, the archbishop there, put out
a call for Catholic hospitals in the city to mesh together into a sort
of health care facility network. (Sorry no links -- a lot of this stuff
is older and dug up from archives.) Bernadin wanted to make sure
that they could be economically viable, in part to ensure that there were
hospitals around the city where those without health insurance or other
means could be cared for.
No doubt, RHC has taken Bernadin's call seriously, moving to corner the
market by gobbling up existing community hospitals. The chain now includes
eight hospitals and seven nursing facilities, and four retirement centers
in Chicagoland.
Since all Resurrection facilities operate according to Catholic health
care directives, suddenly the morning-after pill, tubal ligation (aka
"getting your tubes tied"), an all other forms of contraception,
were harder to get in Chicagoland. Still this forming of a web of Catholic
hospitals was all well and good. Remember, Catholic hospitals were paragons
of community care -- and especially, care for the indigent, those who
often had no where else to go.
The kink in the system now is that it seems as if RHC isn't holding up
its end of the deal. And I mean that in both a moral sense and a legal
one. Approval of some of its mergers were contingent upon the continuation
of care for the poor. Yet Resurrection acknowledged in 2004 that it
had cut
charity care by at least one-third. Illinois' Lieutenant Governor
has accused RHC of failing to care for some poor while charging
others exorbitant rates, and called on Cardinal George, the new archbishop
of Chicago, to get RHC to live up to their mission. There has been one
class action suit and then another, accusing Resurrection of overcharging
or otherwise failing to care for the poor.
And at the same time, we have RHC employees growing fed up with the quality
of care and conditions at their workplaces, and trying for years to form
a union. RHC refuses to meet with them. Here again, seems like there's
a great deal of daylight between how RHC is behaving and how Catholic
teaching calls them to act. How's that? As much as health care is part
of the church's ministry, union organizing is part of the church's teachings.
Catholic leaders have had much to say on the question of labor. Take
for example, the recent U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishop's working paper
called "A
Fair and Just Workplace: Principles and Practices for Catholic Health
Care." Then there's Pope John Paul II fascinating encyclical
called Laborem
Exercens (On Human Work) which details the Church's stand that
we shouldn't get all hung up on labor in and of itself, but the person
doing the laboring -- "man is the subject of work," John Paul
wrote. It follows that Laborem Exercens should have whole section
on the importance of unions titled, in fact, "The Importance of Unions":
The experience of history teaches that organizations of this type are
an indispensable element of social life, especially in modern industrialized
societies.
It's not as if John Paul made this union stuff up out of whole cloth.
Zoom all the way back to Pope Leo XIII and what he says in his encyclical
Rerum Novarum
(On Capital and Labor):
History attests what excellent results were brought about by
the artificers' guilds of olden times. They were the means of affording
not only many advantages to the workmen, but in no small degree of promoting
the advancement of art, as numerous monuments remain to bear witness.
Such unions should be suited to the requirements of this our age—an
age of wider education, of different habits, and of far more numerous
requirements in daily life. It is gratifying to know that there are actually
in existence not a few associations of this nature, consisting either
of workmen alone, or of workmen and employers together, but it were greatly
to be desired that they should become more numerous and more efficient.
We have spoken of them more than once, yet it will be well to explain
here how notably they are needed, to show that they exist of their own
right, and what should be their organization and their mode of action.
It doesn't seem to much of a stretch to say that if RHC is a Catholic
institution in spirit, then they should at the least entertain their workers
notions of forming a union. A delegation of Catholic leaders wrote an
open leader to RHC pushing
them to sit down at a table with their employees (warning: pdf). The
Illinois congressional delegation led by Jan Schakowsky and including
Senators Durbin and Obama called
on RHC CEO Joseph Toomey to just meet and talk already. Still, RHC
refuses.
Am I reaching, or are there shades of Bill
Donohue and the Catholic League in the Resurrection situation? If
you're not going to act Catholic (or Jewish, or...), no more
reaping the benefits of being treated as such.
Permalink | 3 comments