Street Prophets

Theological Significance of Worship: Catholic

Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 04:52:44 PM PDT

Mahanoy and I got to talking in another diary about how the theological significance of worship differs in various traditions, and thought this would be a good topic for a blogathon (ha! I remembered the word!) so that we could get as wide a discussion as possible.

I've also been meaning to start an occasional series on "The Theological Significance of (something)", so this seemed like a good start to it.

Follow me below the fold to read about one Catholic's understanding of the theological significance of worship; and please post your own diary this week, on the theological significance of worship, specifically communal worship, in your own tradition.

For Catholics, "worship" usually means Mass. Certainly when we're talking about attending church every Sunday, as in the diary that sparked this, we mean Mass. There are other ways in which Catholics worship communally, but our basic default mode is Mass.

Mass is just a shorthand way of saying "the celebration of the eucharist". The whole Mass, from the opening blessing, to the scripture readings and sermon, to the consecration and distribution of communion, to the closing blessing and dismissal, constitutes "the celebration of the eucharist".

The theological significance of the eucharist is such an incredibly rich topic that I found it difficult to write this diary. I finally gave up on trying to organize it into any particular structure, and have just written what comes to mind.

I'd like to say one thing about the requirement to attend Mass. It is indeed still true that Catholics are required to attend Mass every Sunday unless illness or some other circumstance prevents us from doing so, and missing Mass is still considered a sin. Aside from the issue of how seriously Catholics do or do not take such prescriptions from the church these days -- a whole other diary!! -- I would like to point out that such prescriptions are simply a mechanism by which to define and implement practices. "Because the Church says so" isn't actually theologically significant, although it may be ecclesially significant, personally significant, sociologically significant, and have significant implications for the demographics and structure of the Church.

But the theological significance is the reason why the Church "says so", and that's what I'm exploring here.

<hr>

The celebration of the eucharist is the "source and summit" of a Catholic Christian's life, and of the life of the Church. Everything we do -- ritually, ecclesially, or in our everyday lives -- is to flow from the celebration of the eucharist, and lead us towards it.

The eucharist is our catechism. The old saying "Lex orandi, lex credendi" -- the law of prayer is the law of belief -- is quite true. The eucharistic liturgy shapes our faith, and leads us more deeply into it.

The eucharist is the place in which all our relationships come together: our relationships with God, with ourselves, with the other people in our parish, with the worldwide church, with the Universal Church, and with all of creation. All relationships need attention, and the eucharistic liturgy is the context in which, and the ritual means by which, we affirm, nurture, and strengthen those bonds.

The weekly rhythm of Sunday mass is the heartbeat of the church, but there's a yearly rhythm as well. Attending every week connects us to the seasonal rhythms of the church year, so we can walk together around the circle of Advent, Christmas, Lent, Easter, Pentecost, the holy days, and the themes of Ordinary Time, despite the calendar of the secular culture that doesn't match our calendar.

As Catholics, we share the common priesthood of Christ, and thus it is our privilege and responsibility to intercede for the world in prayer. We do this most explicitly in the General Intercessions, but also in the Eucharistic Prayer (the Great Thanksgiving) that is offered "to advance the peace and salvation of all the world".

Every celebration of the eucharist mystically participates both in the Last Supper, and in the sacrifice on Calvary. The liturgy is meant to give us practice in "living as if death doesn't matter". When the bread and wine are placed on the altar, we are to place ourselves there, our lives, our gifts, our strengths, our weaknesses: so that, "by the working of the Holy Spirit", we ourselves may be transformed into the body and blood of Christ; so that, "by the mingling of this water and wine, we may come to share in the divinity of Christ, who humbled himself to share in our humanity."

We come to tell our stories,
We come to break the bread,
We come to know our rising from the dead

We come because Jesus told us, "Do this in remembrance of me." We come because "It is right to give God thanks and praise". We come because "from age to age, You gathered a people to Yourself, so that from east to west, a perfect offering may be made to the glory of Your name" -- and without all the people, the offering is imperfect.

We come to celebrate and to receive the sacrament that is the treasure at the heart of the Church, for the grace it gives us that sustains us and gives us strength. We come to build, to be, the temple of living stones.

We come for practice in becoming who we already are.

Catholicism is not an individualistic religion. It's not primarily about "me and God". Even our hymns tend not to use the first person singular, unless we're quoting from Scripture; we use the first person plural, because our emphasis is on the assembled believers, the communion of saints, the body of Christ.

Nobody gets to heaven alone; we are all on the road together, and coming to Mass on Sunday is how we help ourselves and each other along the way.

(If you wanted to stretch this metaphor out of shape, you might even call it the pit stop on the road to heaven. ;) )


Tags: Blogathon, Worship, Theological Significance of Worship (all tags)

Permalink | 19 comments

  • Theologically significant cookie jar (19+ / 0-)

    Let me know you stopped by.

    To participate in the blogathon on this topic, use the tags "Blogathon" and "Worship".

    Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.

    by StarWoman on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 04:51:07 PM PDT

  • Thanks, Star (7+ / 0-)

    Blessings for sharing with us!

    May God bless EVERYONE.

    by Richard Bowser on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 06:37:02 PM PDT

  • OK (6+ / 0-)

    you started it this time, so you have to be the keeper of the index diary :-)

    Of course, maybe that is why I am kept around her - to be the blogsecretary :-)

    SP's Bible in a Year: http://www.streetprophets.com/story/2005/10/19/105536/72

    by JCHFleetguy on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 08:42:24 PM PDT

  • I'm going to quibble (10+ / 0-)

    with your penultimate paragraph:

    Nobody gets to heaven alone; we are all on the road together, and coming to Mass on Sunday is how we help ourselves and each other along the way.

    Somewhat.

    Specifically, that first clause. We all get to heaven alone, because that's how we meet God. And when we do, the ultimate test of whether we remain in God's presence or exile ourselves from it (more about that later) is whether or not we can stand to look God in the face, knowing that we are known in every detail, every grace as well as every flaw, every blessing along with every nightmare. Nobody else can get us into heaven, and we can't get anybody else there.

    But what we can do, as a community of believers--and particularly during the celebration of the Eucharist--is walk with one another on the way. Offer support, encouragement, answers to questions (or questions in need of answers), affirmation, respect, love, and of course, prayers.

    The Eucharist is a big part of that. We only tend to talk of it as "food for the journey" in the context of Viaticum or the Last Rites--the Eucharist that is offered to someone who is at or very near the point of death. But I like that metaphor for common-and-garden everyday Eucharist, too. One of the reasons that we have a requirement to attend Mass every Sunday and holy day, and to receive the Eucharist at minimum once per year, is because people have gotten so caught up in the awe and majesty of the Eucharist, and so (self-)conscious of their own unworthiness, that they were deliberately staying away, when the whole point was to get them there in the first place so that they could be part of that.

    By most orthodox theology, each time we receive the Eucharist, we become in some way a little bit (even microscopically) more like the Christ whose Body and Blood we receive in the form of bread and wine. The more often we go to Mass (or to any liturgical celebration, and there are plenty of others besides the Eucharist), the more ingrained in those habits and ways of thinking we become.

    This is precisely why the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council stated that "the liturgy is the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed; at the same time it is the fount from which all the Church's power flows" (Sacrosanctum Concilium, the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, no. 10).

    Liturgy also (and in particular some of the non-Eucharistic celebrations or the para-Eucharistic celebrations, like the Liturgy of the Hours, Taizé prayer, Eucharistic adoration/Benediction, or sacramentals* like the Rosary or any of the other popular prayer devotions such as novenas, litanies, etc.) offers people a chance to disengage from the bustle of their day-to-day lives, to pause and reconnect to the Fons et Origo, the Source and Origin of all that is, to shut the door of their little mental chamber and spend some time listening for the voice of God stirring within them, as the Fathers observed in Gaudium et spes, the Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, no. 16. It provides time for reflection, for meditation, for consideration of things not of this world, but no less important for being less imminent.

    *Sacramentals (not to be confused with the Sacraments, of which there are seven, the Eucharist being one of them) are sacred signs instituted by the Church (the Sacraments are sacred signs instituted by Christ) for the sanctification of "certain ministries of the Church, certain states of life, a great variety of circumstances in Christian life, and the use of many things helpful to humankind," according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1668. These are things like the devotion of the Rosary, processions, holy water, blessed candles, icons or statues of the saints, etc., that help people focus their prayer by representing or standing for aspects of Ultimate Reality. They are not sacraments in and of themselves, but they can be vehicles for grace if approached in the right frame of mind.

    As to who decides who stays in heaven, here I'm following Thomas Merton, who provided what has been for me the only explanation of how the particular judgement works that makes any sense to me. He says, in "The Good Samaritan":

    The chesed of God is a gratuitous mercy that considers no fitness, no worthiness, and no return. It is the way the Lord looks upon the guilty and with His look makes them at once innocent. This look seems to some to be anger because they fly from it. But if they face it they see that it is love and that they are innocent. (Their flight and the confusion of their own fear make them guilty.)

    I take that to mean that it is not God that sends a soul to perdition, it is that soul's choice to flee from the Beatific Vision (or its inability to stand up to it, if you prefer).

    • Quibble back. (0 / 0)

      That depends entirely on who/what/how you understand God.  And probably how you understand individual personality.

      I'm leaning against any sort of personality that survives this life; the lesson of Nature is not that the flower is reborn, it's that flowers continue.  That underlying thing we ponder that rests behind the persona ("the mask," literally, in the original Etruscan sense of the word, phersu), I suspect is an aspect of the underlying consciousness of the universe.  God (if you will) within, literally.  Thus another understanding of universalism; all are saved because there's nothing that in the end needs saving... or that everything is saved; just two ways of seeing and saying the same thing.  All the personalities... those are "remembered" (this, incidentally, is consistent with the observation by some scientists that the universe appears to be holographic in nature (literally meaning that everything is recorded and remembered in all the rest of it)).

      It's just a wistful thought that we exist as separate, unique, self-motivated beings after death; I think.  But then, it may be a wistful thought that we we're that in life--and an ironic one, given how we yearn for being connected....

      The light is at home in the darkness. -- Parmenides

      by ogre on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 12:05:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    • Quibble cubed (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      musing85

      Thanks for such a thoughtful comment.

      I think our disagreement is a matter of emphasis:

      Nobody else can get us into heaven, and we can't get anybody else there.

      And, we can't get there alone. The "way" to heaven is a way of living that involves us with other people.

      The Eucharist is a big part of that. We only tend to talk of it as "food for the journey" in the context of Viaticum or the Last Rites--the Eucharist that is offered to someone who is at or very near the point of death. But I like that metaphor for common-and-garden everyday Eucharist, too.

      Yes, absolutely. I think of this as we recite the Lord's Prayer just before communion: Give us this day our daily bread.

      I love the Merton quote; thank you. It, and your commentary on it, express an idea I've long held in orthodox terms (which are not the terms I'd held it in. :) )

      Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.

      by StarWoman on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 07:04:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  • Much deeper and much more wholesome than what I (7+ / 0-)

    picked up in Catholic school (pre-Vatican II).

    We had the nuns with the clickers at the 9 AM Mass. The Pavlovian-style conditioning took out a lot of meaning of the Mass for me.

    I have to say that I know others who went to the same or similar schools to the one I did who didn't get the sense of alienation that I did.  I always wonder what set of filters I have that cut out so much of what they obviously heard.  The alcoholism, the sexuality, being bullied/mocked.  I have a few choices; whatever it was has left me wondering and, I must admit, pretty jealous of most here.

    This time, can we elect a President? Please, not another clown.

    by grada3784 on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 02:07:04 AM PDT

    • "This is not your grade school's liturgy" ;) (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      musing85, hamletta, Festina Lente

      We never had clickers (although I can see how one might have needed them, pre-V2), but this isn't what I learned in Catholic school, either.

      I do think one reason many adult Catholics lapse is that they never got past the children's level explanations, and they find them unsatisfying or insufficient. Well, of course they do!

      I remember once in college, I overheard a fellow student explaining in embarrassment that What they told me was that your soul is sort of like an invisible undershirt, and it's stained when you are born, and when you get baptized the stain gets cleaned off, and then when you sin again it gets dirty again, and you have to go to confession to clean it off... That's just ridiculous, I don't believe that.

      It was a perfectly reasonable explanation for a six year old, but somehow she didn't realize it was only a child's explanation. :sigh:

      I'm sorry you had such a poor experience. Thanks for your comment.

      Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.

      by StarWoman on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 07:14:19 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      • True about the grade school. (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        hamletta, Quotefiend

        But I went thru high school in the Catholic school system and was even considering entering a religious order, although very much for the wrong reasons.  Fortunately, I realized I liked sex too much to ever be able to keep the vows, so I didn't join up.

        But I do see so many of my peers who didn't filter out the positives as happened with me. And that is downright scary.

        This time, can we elect a President? Please, not another clown.

        by grada3784 on Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 02:10:30 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  • Star Woman- great diary! (6+ / 0-)

    I am at a loss for words and am suffering from a case of "What she said!" You did it brilliantly!

    What you say about not being saved alone - I tend to think of it as - "I don't want to be saved without you", rings so true for me.

    It is sad, as is noted in grada3784's comment below, that many have had the life drained out of the beauty and power of this ritual.

    In reference to musing85's comments- your use of Merton is both powerful and brilliant. Thank you.

    I couldn't sleep so I got up and came to the Street. So glad I did...

    Thanks and Pax to all.

    Festina Lente - make haste slowly

    by Festina Lente on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 02:19:26 AM PDT

  • An excellent diary (7+ / 0-)

    because I've known so many lapsed oe semi-Catholics who are unappreciative of their Church. The older ones perhaps because they were brought up  too strictly, & younger ones because it was too casual: they did their First Communion & Confirmation, had the parties, & that's all the parents wanted. Yet, most of these people still idendify themselves as Catholics, which is about as meaningful as when I say I'm a Methodist. The longer you stay away, the more difficult it becomes to go home. & if you're honest with  yourself,  maybe you can admit that you're actually homeless.

    "There ain't no sanity clause." Chico Marx http://wfmu.org/playlists/RX

    by Asbury Park on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 02:47:06 AM PDT

    • Not necessarily (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Asbury Park, Sadie Baker, StarWoman

      I didn't even get through confirmation, but I went back after 30 years. So it can be done.

      Or maybe I'm just weird.

      Suzanne holds the mirror.

      by hamletta on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 12:27:03 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      • Not weird, (3+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        hamletta, grada3784, StarWoman

        but if it took 30 years, ir  wasn't easy, & you went through sone kind of spiritual seachange.

        I don't think I'd go back to the UMC now,  knowing I'd immediately  have to start fighting to change it. The denomination  is not important to me.  What I learned - positive & negative - growing up in it is important.

        "There ain't no sanity clause." Chico Marx http://wfmu.org/playlists/RX

        by Asbury Park on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 02:44:48 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    • Homeless? (3+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      musing85, hamletta, paxpdx

      The older ones perhaps because they were brought up  too strictly, & younger ones because it was too casual: they did their First Communion & Confirmation, had the parties, & that's all the parents wanted.

      And this, of course, is exactly the problem that the folks at St Elizabeth's are trying to solve: involving the parents so we don't lose the children.

      Yet, most of these people still idendify themselves as Catholics, which is about as meaningful as when I say I'm a Methodist. The longer you stay away, the more difficult it becomes to go home. & if you're honest with  yourself,  maybe you can admit that you're actually homeless.

      I'm not sure about that. My impression is that Catholics have a much stronger ecclesiology than Protestants do, even though most of us don't or can't articulate it. (For instance, I didn't learn the word "ecclesiology" until a few years ago, but stories of Protestants who think little or nothing of moving from one denomination to another have always seemed profoundly alien to me.)

      Catholics don't join the church; we're adopted into it. Lapsed or barely practicing Catholics aren't homeless any more than the Prodigal Son was homeless: they just haven't been home in a long, long time.

      One thing I really love about the post V2 baptismal liturgy is the use of a baptismal candle, that is lit from the Easter candle. It took me years to notice this, but that candle is an allusion to the candles we all hold every Easter Vigil: every person baptized in my parish is, in principle, one more candle that will be lit at Vigil.

      And conversely, every Easter Vigil, there's a little corner of my heart aware that there are candles missing, that would have been held by all our prodigals.

      Ubi caritas et amor, Deus ibi est.

      by StarWoman on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 07:26:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 19 comments